Twitter Instagram Linkedin
Join Our Channel

IPRG PUBLICATION

DIGITAL GOVERNANCE AND THE REDISTRIBUTION OF ACCESS COSTS: SOCIOECONOMIC EXCLUSION IN INDIA AND KENYA

5/5 - (1 vote)

Authors : Akshita Bhatt , Ishika Agrawal , Ishita Tripathi , Ishita Khandelwal , Joel Kimanthi

Citation

Akshita Bhatt, Ishika Agrawal, Ishita Tripathi, Ishita Khandelwal, & Joel Kimanthi. (2026). DIGITAL GOVERNANCE AND THE REDISTRIBUTION OF ACCESS COSTS: SOCIOECONOMIC EXCLUSION IN INDIA AND KENYA. Institute For Policy Research and Governance, 1(17). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23218595

Download Paper

Abstract

Digitalisation is often presented as a way to make public-service delivery more efficient, but greater administrative efficiency does not necessarily mean lower costs for citizens. This paper examines how digital public services can contribute to socioeconomic exclusion through the redistribution of access and transaction costs. Using secondary evidence from India and Kenya, the paper examines how digital requirements interact with unequal resources, accessibility conditions and available support. Across the evidence, barriers involving connectivity, literacy, documentation, authentication and service design can create additional costs for citizens in the form of time, expenditure, effort, repeated attempts and reliance on others. These burdens are uneven and can affect whether access is independent, assisted, burdened or results in exclusion. The evidence differs across the two countries, but in both settings digitalisation can change where the work and costs involved in accessing a service are located. Assessing digital governance therefore requires looking at citizen-side burdens alongside administrative efficiency.

Keywords: digital governance; digital exclusion; transaction costs; administrative burden; accessibility; socioeconomic inequality

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Publications

The Role Of Climate Forecasts In Shaping Adaptation Behaviour: Evidence From A Cross-Country Survey

Authors : Fareed Ahmad, Mwita Chacha, Obodo Lotachi

Abstract

Climate change presents considerable global threats, particularly in regions that are dependent on climate-sensitive livelihoods. While advances in climate forecasting have improved the availability and accuracy of climate information, a persistent gap remains between information access and actual adaptive behaviour. This study investigates the
behavioural mechanisms that translate climate forecasts into adaptive action using a cross-country survey of 309 respondents across six countries: India, Kenya, Egypt,
Indonesia, Nigeria and Japan. Using quantitative method including descriptive statistics, Spearman’s correlation and multiple linear regression, this study examined the roles of Access to Climate Forecast Information (ACF), Trust in Climate Information (TCI) and Climate Risk Perception (CRP) in shaping Climate Adaptation Behaviour (CAB).
Descriptive analysis revealed a pronounced perception-action gap: climate risk
perception was high (mean = 4.09) while adaptation behaviour remained moderate
(mean = 3.53). Regression analysis demonstrated that trust in climate information (β =0.299, p < 0.001) and access to forecasts (β = 0.179, p = 0.003) were significant predictors of adaptive behaviour, whereas risk perception alone was not statistically significant (p = 0.275). These findings carry important implications for designing climate services and evidence-based policy interventions. Keywords:
 Climate Adaptation Behaviour; Climate Forecasts; Trust in Information; Risk
Perception; Cross-Country Analysis; Climate Policy

Read More »
Transnational Educational Migration: A Comparative Review of Policy Responses to Internationalisation in Germany and the Netherlands

Authors : Saba Suhail Khan , Ankita Hansda , Fathima Thamanna PP , Barnali Roy

Abstract

Internationalisation of higher education has become increasingly connected with international student mobility, migration and labour-market policy. This study examines how Germany and the Netherlands responded to these developments. Although both countries operate within a shared European higher education and migration environment, their policy responses have developed in different directions. A similar system design was used to compare these two cases. The analysis draws on a corpus of 37 legislative, parliamentary and policy documents and combines descriptive statistics, text-as-data analysis and critical discourse analysis based on Fairclough’s three-dimensional framework. Policy documents were examined across four broad policy orientations; attraction, management, retention and labour and fourteen related policy instruments. The comparison shows that Germany has developed a comparatively expansive approach to internationalisation. International students are increasingly viewed not only as participants in higher education but also as a potential source of skilled labour in response to demographic change and workforce shortages. The Netherlands has followed a more managed and selective approach. While the academic and economic value of internationalisation continues to be recognised, greater attention has been given to housing pressures, institutional capacity, language and access for domestic students. These differences suggest that the policy divide cannot be reduced to a simple distinction between open and restrictive systems. Instead, national responses reflect different combinations of labour-market needs, demographic pressures, institutional capacity and domestic social priorities. The study highlights the need for internationalisation policies that balance educational openness with sustainable institutional capacity, labour-market needs and broader social considerations.

Keywords:
 Transnational Educational Migration, International Student Mobility, Internationalisation of Higher Education, Comparative Policy Analysis, Policy Divergence, Policy Discourse, Germany, The Netherlands.

Read More »
DIGITAL GOVERNANCE AND THE REDISTRIBUTION OF ACCESS COSTS: SOCIOECONOMIC EXCLUSION IN INDIA AND KENYA

Authors : Akshita Bhatt , Ishika Agrawal , Ishita Tripathi , Ishita Khandelwal , Joel Kimanthi

Abstract

Digitalisation is often presented as a way to make public-service delivery more efficient, but greater administrative efficiency does not necessarily mean lower costs for citizens. This paper examines how digital public services can contribute to socioeconomic exclusion through the redistribution of access and transaction costs. Using secondary evidence from India and Kenya, the paper examines how digital requirements interact with unequal resources, accessibility conditions and available support. Across the evidence, barriers involving connectivity, literacy, documentation, authentication and service design can create additional costs for citizens in the form of time, expenditure, effort, repeated attempts and reliance on others. These burdens are uneven and can affect whether access is independent, assisted, burdened or results in exclusion. The evidence differs across the two countries, but in both settings digitalisation can change where the work and costs involved in accessing a service are located. Assessing digital governance therefore requires looking at citizen-side burdens alongside administrative efficiency.

Keywords:
 digital governance; digital exclusion; transaction costs; administrative burden; accessibility; socioeconomic inequality

Read More »
BRICS Plus and Contested Multilateralism: Policy Coordination, Internal Tensions, and the Role of Emerging Middle Powers in Global Governance Reform

Authors: Kamatchi Devi S; Revanth Udutha; Vanshita Baid

Abstract

Academic research has increased its focus on BRICS Plus expansion which occurred during the early 2020s because researchers want to determine whether this alliance serves as a counterforce against the Western-dominated liberal international order or operates mainly as a national interest-driven platform. The research investigates how BRICS Plus members coordinate their policies while assessing their global governance reform efforts and studying how the group handles internal conflicts which arise from the ongoing competition between India and China. The study uses qualitative research methods to analyze secondary data from BRICS summit declarations and institutional documents and existing academic literature. BRICS Plus shows increasing rhetorical unity and institutional governance reform collaboration but actual governance reform partnerships remain limited because of power imbalances and different national objectives and clashing leadership goals. Indian, Brazilian, and South African emerging middle powers use BRICS to improve their strategic independence and international recognition instead of establishing a unified movement against existing power structures. The research demonstrates that BRICS Plus functions as a contested multilateral system which permits international governance changes to proceed through minor
adjustments that avoid major transformations of the current global system.

Key words :
BRICS Plus Expansion, Contested Multilateralism, Global
Governance Reform, Emerging Middle Powers, Policy Coordination and Power
Asymmetries

Read More »
China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Debt Diplomacy or Development Financing? A Comparative Case Study of Sri Lanka and Pakistan

Authors : Aaditya Dewansh, Huny Thakkar, Edward Mbeleki, Mansha Arya, Zinte Kula

Abstract :

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched by China in 2013, has generated sustained debate over whether it functions as a deliberate instrument of debt diplomacy aimed at strategic asset acquisition, or as a development financing mechanism responding to genuine infrastructure deficits in recipient countries. This paper addresses that question through a comparative case study of Sri Lanka and Pakistan: two BRI-engaged South Asian states that share the same creditor yet exhibit structurally distinct outcomes. Drawing on a three-tier qualitative methodology combining comparative case analysis, historical examination of high-value BRI projects, and content analysis of “debt-trap diplomacy” discourse, we argue that strategic dependency in both cases emerges not from engineered default, but through two distinct pathways: fiscal vulnerability in Sri Lanka and infrastructural entrenchment in Pakistan. In Sri Lanka, domestic governance failures and aggressive external commercial borrowing produced the conditions for the 2017 Hambantota Port concession, driven by a new government’s fiscal desperation rather than predatory Chinese design. In
Pakistan, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) generated long-term institutional lock-in through the sheer scale of energy infrastructure investment and an asymmetric bureaucratic coordination model. Across both cases, local political elites exercised agency in seeking Chinese capital to bypass Western conditionalities, and dependency emerged as a by-product of borrower governance failures and project scale rather than Chinese strategic calculation. These findings challenge the binary of debt diplomacy versus development financing, offering instead a mechanism-based account of how BRI engagement produces different forms of strategic influence in different political-economic contexts.

Keywords:
 Belt and Road Initiative, debt diplomacy, strategic dependency, fiscal
vulnerability, infrastructure entrenchment

Read More »
Trending but Not Transforming: Generation Z’s Social Media Activism and Its Diplomatic Impact in International Relations

Authors : Gayatri Gaikwad , Mehak Bhutani , Amina Dossa, Shalini Sarkar, Zainab Amjad

Abstract :


Generation Z the cohort born between approximately 1997 and 2012 has emerged as the most digitally mobilised generation in political history, leveraging platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, X and Discord to organise transnational advocacy and challenge entrenched governance structures. Yet a critical paradox persists ,the generation that trends globally rarely transforms diplomatically. This paper examines the relationship between Generation Z’s social media activism and its tangible impact on international relations, arguing that while digital activism has democratised political expression and produced measurable domestic disruptions, its structural conversion into lasting diplomatic outcomes remains limited and uneven. Drawing on comparative case studies alongside empirical evidence from quantitative platform studies and theoretical frameworks of soft power, generational theory, and networked social movements, this paper identifies the conditions under which digital youth activism does and does not translate into diplomatic recalibration. It further interrogates platform architecture, disinformation dynamics, and the mobilisation-distraction paradox as structural constraints on Gen Z’s diplomatic agency. The findings suggest that while Generation Z constitutes a genuinely novel geopolitical force, the efficacy of their digital activism in reshaping international relations depends critically on context, institutional responsiveness, and the capacity to bridge online momentum with sustained offline institutional engagement.

Keywords –
 Gen z, Diplomacy , Social Media ,Digitalisation

Read More »
error: Content is protected !!

Powered by CookieAdmin
Scroll to Top